This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bishop, D. M. Articles by Henretta, J. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Prosecutorial Waiver: Case Study of a Questionable Reform

Charles E. Frazier

John C. Henretta

Consistent with a trend toward more punitive responses to delinquency, many states have enacted laws that facilitate the transfer of young offenders to criminal court by bypassing the traditional waiver hearing. The most highly controversial of these streamlined transfer methods is prosecutorial waiver, which allows prosecutors to choose whether to initiate proceedings in juvenile or criminal court. This article examines the practice of prosecutorial waiver in Florida, a state that grants prosecutors extremely wide latitude with respect to the transfer of 16- and 17-year-olds. Our analyses focus on interviews conducted with prosecutors in each of the state's judicial circuits, as well as individual-level case data on transfers in two urban counties. Few of the juveniles transferred via prosecutorial waiver are the kinds of dangerous, repeat offenders for whom waiver is arguably justified. This is in large part due to the lack of statutory guidelines to govern the selection of cases, the ease with which waiver is accomplished, and the lack of support among prosecutors for traditional principles of juvenile justice.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I-F. Jan, J. D. Ball, and A. Walsh Predicting Public Opinion About Juvenile Waivers Criminal Justice Policy Review, September 1, 2008; 19(3): 285 - 300. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. D. Burrow Examining the Influence of Matza's Principles of Justice and Their Impact on Reverse Waiver Decisions: Has Kadi-(In)justice Survived? Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, January 1, 2008; 6(1): 59 - 82. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Burrow Reverse Waiver and the Effects of Legal, Statutory, and Secondary Legal Factors on Sentencing Outcomes for Juvenile Offenders Crime Delinquency, January 1, 2008; 54(1): 34 - 64. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. L. Jordan and D. L. Myers The Decertification of Transferred Youth: Examining the Determinants of Reverse Waiver Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, April 1, 2007; 5(2): 188 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Kupchik The Decision to Incarcerate in Juvenile and Criminal Courts Criminal Justice Review, December 1, 2006; 31(4): 309 - 336. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. H. Lemmon, T. L. Austin, P. J. Verrecchia, and M. Fetzer The Effect of Legal and Extralegal Factors on Statutory Exclusion of Juvenile Offenders Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, July 1, 2005; 3(3): 214 - 234. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. R. Marczyk, K. Heilbrun, T. Lander, and D. Dematteo Juvenile Decertification: Developing a Model for Classification and Prediction Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 2005; 32(3): 278 - 301. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. I. Singer Incarcerating Juveniles Into Adulthood: Organizational Fields of Knowledge and the Back End of Waiver Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, April 1, 2003; 1(2): 115 - 127. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. E. FRAZIER, D. M. BISHOP, and L. LANZA-KADUCE Get-Tough Juvenile Justice Reforms: The Florida Experience The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, July 1, 1999; 564(1): 167 - 184. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. P. Mears Evaluation Issues Confronting Juvenile Justice Sentencing Reforms: A Case Study of Texas Crime Delinquency, July 1, 1998; 44(3): 443 - 463. [Abstract]

				E. J. Fritsch, T. J. Caeti, and C. Hemmens Spare the Needle but Not the Punishment: The Incarceration of Waived Youth in Texas Prisons Crime Delinquency, October 1, 1996; 42(4): 593 - 609. [Abstract]

				D. M. Bishop, C. E. Frazier, L. Lanza-Kaduce, and L. Winner The Transfer of Juveniles to Criminal Court: Does it Make a Difference? Crime Delinquency, April 1, 1996; 42(2): 171 - 191. [Abstract]

				J. B. Sanborn Jr. Certification to Criminal Court: The Important Policy Questions of How, When, and Why Crime Delinquency, April 1, 1994; 40(2): 262 - 281. [Abstract]

				T. M. Poulos and S. Orchowsky Serious Juvenile Offenders: Predicting the Probability of Transfer to Criminal Court Crime Delinquency, January 1, 1994; 40(1): 3 - 17. [Abstract]