Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Crime & Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0011128706296733v1
54/2/225    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hubbard, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reconciling the Differences Between the "Gender-Responsive" and the "What Works" Literatures to Improve Services for Girls

Dana Jones Hubbard

Cleveland State University

Betsy Matthews

Eastern Kentucky University

Recent increases in the delinquency and incarceration of girls have prompted juvenile justice professionals to search for effective, gender-specific prevention and treatment strategies. Given the dearth of research on girls' programming, these professionals are often left to sort out discrepancies between two major bodies of literature that address the needs of delinquent girls—the "what works" literature and the "gender-responsive" literature. This article culls the best of what is available within both these bodies of literature and suggests programmatic elements deemed essential for working effectively with girls.

Key Words: girls • gender-responsive • what works

This version was published on April 1, 2008

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 54, No. 2, 225-258 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128706296733
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
T. Q. Emeka and J. R. Sorensen
Female Juvenile Risk: Is There a Need for Gendered Assessment Instruments?
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, October 1, 2009; 7(4): 313 - 330.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
M. A. Zahn, J. C. Day, S. F. Mihalic, and L. Tichavsky
Determining What Works for Girls in the Juvenile Justice System: A Summary of Evaluation Evidence
Crime Delinquency, April 1, 2009; 55(2): 266 - 293.
[Abstract] [PDF]