Crime & Delinquency

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lane, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sehgal, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 51, No. 1, 26-52 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128704264943

Evaluating an Experimental Intensive Juvenile Probation Program: Supervision and Official Outcomes

Jodi Lane

Center for Studies in Criminology and Law, University of Florida

Susan Turner

Criminal Justice Center, RAND Public Safety and Justice Program

Terry Fain

RAND Public Safety and Justice Program

Amber Sehgal

RAND Public Safety and Justice Program

In 1996, California provided funding to 14 county probation agencies to implement multiagency, comprehensive services to keep troubled youths from recommitting crime and progressing farther into the justice system. We report results of a randomized experiment used to evaluate Ventura County’s 4-year demonstration project called the South Oxnard Challenge Project (SOCP). We followed youths for more than 2 years after random assignment to SOCP or routine probation. We found no significant differences between SOCP and routine juvenile probationers on recidivism or other official-record outcomes. Although most youths were rearrested, most did not receive a sustained petition or incarceration. The modest additional services did not affect outcomes.

Key Words: juvenile probation • restorative justice • evaluation • experimental design • random assignment


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
J. Lane
Exploring Fear of General and Gang Crimes among Juveniles on Probation: The Impacts of Delinquent Behaviors
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, January 1, 2006; 4(1): 34 - 54.
[Abstract] [PDF]