Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Crime & Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Yee, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Effects of Behavioral/Cognitive-Behavioral Programs on Recidivism

Frank S. Pearson

National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.

Douglas S. Lipton

National Development and Research Institutes, Inc. (retired)

Charles M. Cleland

National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.

Dorline S. Yee

National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.

The CDATE project coded studies of treatment/intervention programs in prison, jail, probation, or parole settings reported from 1968 through 1996. Meta-analyses were conducted on the 69 primary research studies on the effectiveness of behavioral and cognitive-behavioral treatment in reducing recidivism for offenders. Results on this heterogeneous collection of studies show that this treatment is associated with reduced recidivism rates. However, this effect is mainly due to cognitive-behavioral interventions rather than to standard behavior modification approaches. The specific types of programs shown to be effective include cognitive-behavioral social skills development programs and cognitive skills (Reasoning and Rehabilitation) programs.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 48, No. 3, 476-496 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/001112870204800306
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
E. J. Salisbury, P. Van Voorhis, and G. V. Spiropoulos
The Predictive Validity of a Gender-Responsive Needs Assessment: An Exploratory Study
Crime Delinquency, October 1, 2009; 55(4): 550 - 585.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Prison JournalHome page
G. G. Ferszt, D. Salgado, S. DeFedele, and M. Leveillee
Houses of Healing: A Group Intervention for Grieving Women in Prison
The Prison Journal, March 1, 2009; 89(1): 46 - 64.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
J. B. Ashford, K. W. Wong, and K. O. Sternbach
Generic Correctional Programming for Mentally Ill Offenders: A Pilot Study
Criminal Justice and Behavior, April 1, 2008; 35(4): 457 - 473.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Prison JournalHome page
M. L. Prendergast and H. K. Wexler
Correctional Substance Abuse Treatment Programs in California: a Historical Perspective
The Prison Journal, March 1, 2004; 84(1): 8 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Prison JournalHome page
E. A. Hall, M. L. Prendergast, J. Wellisch, M. Patten, and Y. Cao
Treating Drug-Abusing Women Prisoners: an Outcomes Evaluation of the Forever Free Program
The Prison Journal, March 1, 2004; 84(1): 81 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Contemporary Criminal JusticeHome page
R. Borum
Managing At-Risk Juvenile Offenders in the Community: Putting Evidence-Based Principles Into Practice
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, February 1, 2003; 19(1): 114 - 137.
[Abstract] [PDF]