This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sorensen, J. Articles by Stemen, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Effect of State Sentencing Policies on Incarceration Rates

State Sentencing and Corrections Program, Vera Institute of Justice

Don Stemen

State Sentencing and Corrections Program, Vera Institute of Justice

This aricle explores the relationship between sentencing policies and the state incarceration rate, prison admission rate, and average sentence length in the late 1990s. Presumptive sentencing guidelines represent the only policy consistently related to incarceration and admission rates, whereas three strikes laws may increase the rate of admission to prison among those arrested for drug offenses. Determinate sentencing, mandatory sentencing, and truth-in-sentencing laws have no effect on rates of incarceration or admission. Crime rates, the percentage of the population that is Black, and citizen ideology have the greatest influence on the rates of incarceration and admission across states. The apparently limited effects of sentencing policies on incarceration or admission rates should give pause to state policy makers seeking to quickly alter prison populations through the adoption of such policies without considering other factors that independently influence prison populations in their states.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 48, No. 3, 456-475 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/001112870204800305


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Steiner and J. Wooldredge Comparing State- Versus Facility-Level Effects on Crowding in U.S. Correctional Facilities Crime Delinquency, April 1, 2008; 54(2): 259 - 290. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Cohen and E. L. Jeglic Sex Offender Legislation in the United States: What Do We Know? Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, August 1, 2007; 51(4): 369 - 383. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. D. Stucky, K. Heimer, and J. B. Lang A Bigger Piece of the Pie? State Corrections Spending and the Politics of Social Order Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, February 1, 2007; 44(1): 91 - 123. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. R. Weidner, R. S. Frase, and J. S. Schultz The Impact of Contextual Factors on the Decision to Imprison in Large Urban Jurisdictions: A Multilevel Analysis Crime Delinquency, July 1, 2005; 51(3): 400 - 424. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Nicholson-Crotty The Impact of Sentencing Guidelines on State-Level Sanctions: An Analysis Over Time Crime Delinquency, July 1, 2004; 50(3): 395 - 411. [Abstract] [PDF]