This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lane, J. Articles by Bishop, D. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Adult Versus Juvenile Sanctions: Voices of Incarcerated Youths

Department of Sociology and Criminology, Center for Studies in Criminology and Law, University of Florida

Lonn Lanza-Kaduce

Department of Sociology and Criminology, Center for Studies in Criminology and Law, University of Florida

Charles E. Frazier

Department of Sociology and Criminology, University of Florida

Donna M. Bishop

College of Criminal Justice, Northeastern University

This article reports findings from face-to-face interviews with youthful offenders in Florida, about half of whom had been transferred to the adult system and half of whom were retained in the juvenile system. The focus is on the youths’global assessments of the impact of their correctional experiences relevant to subsequent offending. The overall impact of each recalled correctional disposition was rated (ranging from beneficial impact to negative impact). For respondents who had experienced multiple correctional dispositions, comparisons were made about the relative impact of low-end versus deepend juvenile commitments and juvenile versus adult sanctions. Youths believed deep-end juvenile placements were most beneficial. Those programs were viewed as having provided education or life skills. When youths viewed adult sanctions as being beneficial, the benefit was linked to the time and pain of prison confinement. Those youths who attributed positive impact to prison had "skipped" deep-end juvenile placements.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 48, No. 3, 431-455 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128702048003004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Inderbitzin Reentry of Emerging Adults: Adolescent Inmates' Transition Back Into the Community Journal of Adolescent Research, July 1, 2009; 24(4): 453 - 476. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. M. Brank and J. Lane Punishing My Parents: Juveniles' Perspectives on Parental Responsibility Criminal Justice Policy Review, September 1, 2008; 19(3): 333 - 348. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. J. Benekos and A. V. Merlo Juvenile Justice: The Legacy of Punitive Policy Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, January 1, 2008; 6(1): 28 - 46. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Burrow Reverse Waiver and the Effects of Legal, Statutory, and Secondary Legal Factors on Sentencing Outcomes for Juvenile Offenders Crime Delinquency, January 1, 2008; 54(1): 34 - 64. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Inderbitzin Inside a maximum-security juvenile training school: Institutional attempts to redefine the American Dream and `normalize' incarcerated youth Punishment Society, July 1, 2007; 9(3): 235 - 251. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Inderbitzin A Look From the Inside: Balancing Custody and Treatment in a Juvenile Maximum-Security Facility Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, June 1, 2007; 51(3): 348 - 362. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Inderbitzin Guardians of the State's Problem Children: An Ethnographic Study of Staff Members in a Juvenile Correctional Facility The Prison Journal, December 1, 2006; 86(4): 431 - 451. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Inderbitzin Lessons From a Juvenile Training School: Survival and Growth Journal of Adolescent Research, January 1, 2006; 21(1): 7 - 26. [Abstract] [PDF]