This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Silver, E. Articles by Miller, L. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Cautionary Note on the Use of Actuarial Risk Assessment Tools for Social Control

Crime, Law, and Justice Program, Department of Sociology, Pennsylvania State University

Lisa L. Miller

Pennsylvania State University

Actuarial risk assessment tools for predicting interpersonal violence and criminal recidivism have proliferated in recent years, promising to enhance their use in the day-to-day operations of the criminal justice and mental health systems. The authors consider the social and political implications of using actuarial tools for social control by offering two specific challenges. First, they argue that actuarial tools are designed primarily to facilitate the efficient management of institutional resources rather than to target individuals or social conditions in need of reform. Second, they argue that the group-based nature of actuarial prediction methods may contribute to the continued marginalization of populations already at the fringes of the economic and political mainstream.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 48, No. 1, 138-161 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128702048001006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Pollack Labelling Clients 'Risky': Social Work and the Neo-liberal Welfare State Br. J. Soc. Work, May 30, 2008; (2008) bcn079v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Holtfreter and R. Cupp Gender and Risk Assessment: The Empirical Status of the LSI-R for Women Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, November 1, 2007; 23(4): 363 - 382. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Pollack "I'm Just Not Good in Relationships": Victimization Discourses and the Gendered Regulation of Criminalized Women Feminist Criminology, April 1, 2007; 2(2): 158 - 174. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Blanchette and K. N. Taylor Development and Field Test of a Gender-Informed Security Reclassification Scale for Female Offenders Criminal Justice and Behavior, March 1, 2007; 34(3): 362 - 379. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Kleiman, B. J. Ostrom, and F. L. Cheesman II Using Risk Assessment to Inform Sentencing Decisions for Nonviolent Offenders in Virginia Crime Delinquency, January 1, 2007; 53(1): 106 - 132. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. W. Whiteacre Testing the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) for Racial/Ethnic Bias Criminal Justice Policy Review, September 1, 2006; 17(3): 330 - 342. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Craig, A. Beech, and K. D. Browne Cross-Validation of the Risk Matrix 2000 Sexual and Violent Scales J Interpers Violence, May 1, 2006; 21(5): 612 - 633. [Abstract] [PDF]