Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Crime & Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Short-Run Cost-Benefit Analysis of Community-Based Interventions for Juvenile Offenders

Angela A. Robertson

Paul W. Grimes

Kevin E. Rogers

Recent empirical research indicates that for juvenile offenders various community-based intervention techniques result in significantly greater positive effects when compared to more traditional approaches. This article presents a cost-benefit evaluation of two such techniques: intensive supervision and monitoring (ISM) and intensive outpatient counseling with cognitive behavioral therapy (CB). A two-equation regression model that controlled for differences in demographic characteristics, personality traits, behavior, and the home environment of the subjects was estimated. The results indicate that, relative to those on probation, participants in the CB program imposed significantly fewer costs on the justice system during the investigative period. No significant difference in justice system expenditures was demonstrated by the ISM group. Comparing the reduced costs of the CB program to the marginal cost of administering the program revealed a net saving of $1,435 in justice system expenditures per youth offender served for the sample period.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 47, No. 2, 265-284 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128701047002006
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
C. S. Schwalbe, R. J. Macy, S. H. Day, and M. W. Fraser
Classifying Offenders: An Application of Latent Class Analysis to Needs Assessment in Juvenile Justice
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, July 1, 2008; 6(3): 279 - 294.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Research in Crime and DelinquencyHome page
S. M. Fass and C.-R. Pi
Getting Tough on Juvenile Crime: An Analysis of Costs and Benefits
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, November 1, 2002; 39(4): 363 - 399.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Prison JournalHome page
D. P. FARRINGTON, A. PETROSINO, and B. C. WELSH
Systematic Reviews and Cost-Benefit Analyses of Correctional Interventions
The Prison Journal, September 1, 2001; 81(3): 339 - 359.
[Abstract] [PDF]