Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Crime & Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Killias, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ribeaud, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Learning Through Controlled Experiments: Community Service and Heroin Prescription in Switzerland

Martin Killias

Marcelo F. Aebi

Denis Ribeaud

Europe, over the past two decades, has seen many innovations in the field of corrections, particularly new sanctions that are becoming increasingly popular as alternatives to imprisonment, such as community service. Innovative approaches have also been tested in the field of drug treatment, including large-scale drug-substitution programs. Usually, such programs have been evaluated, if at all, under the form of before-after studies. Thus, little is known about treatment effects, particularly in the longer run and/or compared to alternative approaches. Two controlled experiments conducted recently in Switzerland involving community service and heroin prescription to addicts may indicate a shift to more rigorous evaluations. They both illustrate the potentials of controlled experiments for progress in knowledge as well as some problems in methodological, legal, ethical, and practical respects. Whereas controlled experiments are necessary to learn in some areas, more conventional before-after studies may be valid under particular circumstances.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 46, No. 2, 233-251 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128700046002006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
M. Petrunik and L. Deutschmann
The Exclusion-Inclusion Spectrum in State and Community Response to Sex Offenders in Anglo-American and European Jurisdictions
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, October 1, 2008; 52(5): 499 - 519.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
L. W. Sherman and H. Strang
Experimental Ethnography: The Marriage of Qualitative and Quantitative Research
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, September 1, 2004; 595(1): 204 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]