|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Randomized Experiments in Criminal Justice Policy: Prospects and Problems
David Weisburd
In theory, experimental designs provide the most reliable method to establish a relationship between interventions and outcomes. However, in practice, randomized experiments have remained a much less common choice for criminal justice evaluators than have nonexperimental methods. This article focuses on factors that have traditionally inhibited the use of randomized experiments as a tool for developing criminal justice policy. In this context, the main ethical, political, and practical barriers that face experimenters are described. General principles for identifying circumstances less or more amenable for developing randomized experiments are also defined. In concluding, it is argued that experiments are possible in many circumstances and can provide a powerful tool for developing criminal justice policy.
Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 46, No. 2,
181-193 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128700046002003

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Knepper
Crime Prevention in a Multinational Open Society
International Criminal Justice Review,
May 1, 2005;
15(1):
58 - 74.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. P. Farrington
British Randomized Experiments on Crime and Justice
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
September 1, 2003;
589(1):
150 - 167.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. P. Farrington
A Short History of Randomized Experiments in Criminology: A Meager Feast
Eval Rev,
June 1, 2003;
27(3):
218 - 227.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Weisburd
Ethical Practice and Evaluation of Interventions in Crime and Justice: The Moral Imperative for Randomized Trials
Eval Rev,
June 1, 2003;
27(3):
336 - 354.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|