Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Crime & Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weisburd, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Randomized Experiments in Criminal Justice Policy: Prospects and Problems

David Weisburd

In theory, experimental designs provide the most reliable method to establish a relationship between interventions and outcomes. However, in practice, randomized experiments have remained a much less common choice for criminal justice evaluators than have nonexperimental methods. This article focuses on factors that have traditionally inhibited the use of randomized experiments as a tool for developing criminal justice policy. In this context, the main ethical, political, and practical barriers that face experimenters are described. General principles for identifying circumstances less or more amenable for developing randomized experiments are also defined. In concluding, it is argued that experiments are possible in many circumstances and can provide a powerful tool for developing criminal justice policy.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 46, No. 2, 181-193 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128700046002003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
P. Knepper
Crime Prevention in a Multinational Open Society
International Criminal Justice Review, May 1, 2005; 15(1): 58 - 74.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
D. P. Farrington
British Randomized Experiments on Crime and Justice
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, September 1, 2003; 589(1): 150 - 167.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
D. P. Farrington
A Short History of Randomized Experiments in Criminology: A Meager Feast
Eval Rev, June 1, 2003; 27(3): 218 - 227.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
D. Weisburd
Ethical Practice and Evaluation of Interventions in Crime and Justice: The Moral Imperative for Randomized Trials
Eval Rev, June 1, 2003; 27(3): 336 - 354.
[Abstract] [PDF]