Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Crime & Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minor, K. I.
Right arrow Articles by Williamson, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Sentence Completion and Recidivism among Juveniles Referred to Teen Courts

Kevin I. Minor

James B. Wells

Irina R. Soderstrom

Rachel Bingham

Deborah Williamson

This study focuses on sentence completion and recidivism of juveniles referred to teen courts for disposition by their peers as an alternative to judicial sentencing. More than 70 percent of the referrals completed their sentences, and just less than a third recidivated over a 1-year follow-up. In multivariate models, sentence completion was significantly less likely among persons sentenced to community service, and recidivism was significantly higher among juveniles with prior records and those who were sentenced to curfews. The findings imply the need for teen courts to be guided by sound program development efforts that are based on research so that they may circumvent the panacea phenomenon.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 45, No. 4, 467-480 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128799045004004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
T. Q. Emeka and J. R. Sorensen
Female Juvenile Risk: Is There a Need for Gendered Assessment Instruments?
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, October 1, 2009; 7(4): 313 - 330.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
B. Kim and V. B. Titterington
Abused South Korean Women: A Comparison of Those Who Do and Those Who Do Not Resort to Lethal Violence
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, February 1, 2009; 53(1): 93 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
D. K. Forgays and L. DeMilio
Is Teen Court Effective for Repeat Offenders? A Test of the Restorative Justice Approach
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, February 1, 2005; 49(1): 107 - 118.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
A. Rasmussen
Teen Court Referral, Sentencing, and Subsequent Recidivism: Two Proportional Hazards Models and a Little Speculation
Crime Delinquency, October 1, 2004; 50(4): 615 - 635.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 American Behavioral ScientistHome page
A. J. Dick, D. J. Pence, R. M. Jones, and H. R. Geertsen
The Need for Theory in Assessing Peer Courts
American Behavioral Scientist, July 1, 2004; 47(11): 1448 - 1461.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
P. Harrison, J. R. Maupin, and G. L. Mays
Teen Court: An Examination of Processes and Outcomes
Crime Delinquency, April 1, 2001; 47(2): 243 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]