This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Pratt, T. C. Articles by Maahs, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Are Private Prisons More Cost-Effective Than Public Prisons? A Meta-Analysis of Evaluation Research Studies

Jeff Maahs

The need to reduce the costs of incarceration to state and federal correctional agencies has allowed the movement to privatize correctional institutions to gain considerable momentum. The empirical evidence regarding whether private prisons are more costeffective than public institutions, however, is inconclusive. To address this question, a meta-analysis was conducted of 33 cost-effectiveness evaluations of private and public prisons from 24 independent studies. The results revealed that private prisons were no more cost-effective than public prisons, and that other institutional characteristics—such as the facility's economy of scale, age, and security level—were the strongest predictors of a prison's daily per diem cost.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 45, No. 3, 358-371 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128799045003004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. W. Lundahl, C. Kunz, C. Brownell, N. Harris, and R. Van Vleet Prison Privatization: A Meta-analysis of Cost and Quality of Confinement Indicators Research on Social Work Practice, July 1, 2009; 19(4): 383 - 394. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Shefer and A. Liebling Prison privatization: In search of a business-like atmosphere? JCriminology and Criminal Justice, August 1, 2008; 8(3): 261 - 278. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Steiner and J. Wooldredge Comparing State- Versus Facility-Level Effects on Crowding in U.S. Correctional Facilities Crime Delinquency, April 1, 2008; 54(2): 259 - 290. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. T. Goodsell Six Normative Principles for the Contracting-Out Debate Administration Society, January 1, 2007; 38(6): 669 - 688. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. E. Price and N. M. Riccucci Exploring the Determinants of Decisions to Privatize State Prisons The American Review of Public Administration, September 1, 2005; 35(3): 223 - 235. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. S. Armstrong and D. L. MacKenzie Private Versus Public Juvenile Correctional Facilities: Do Differences in Environmental Quality Exist? Crime Delinquency, October 1, 2003; 49(4): 542 - 563. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Perrone and T. C. Pratt Comparing the Quality of Confinement and Cost-Effectiveness of Public Versus Private Prisons: What We Know, Why We Do Not Know More, and Where to Go from Here The Prison Journal, September 1, 2003; 83(3): 301 - 322. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. D. REISIG and T. C. PRATT The Ethics of Correctional Privatization: A Critical Examination of the Delegation of Coercive Authority The Prison Journal, June 1, 2000; 80(2): 210 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF]