Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Crime & Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Presser, L.
Right arrow Articles by Gunnison, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Strange Bedfellows: Is Sex Offender Notification a Form of Community Justice?

Lois Presser

Elaine Gunnison

Nationwide legislation requires that the names of convicted sex offenders living in communities be made public. The social movement that drives sex offender notification uses the rhetoric of community justice. The authors consider whether notification is truly a community justice initiative. The logic of notification is compared with that of restorative community justice. Implicit and explicit understandings of community, victims, offenders, and social control are examined. The article concludes that the principles of notification are largely inconsistent with those of community justice. The success of the notification movement highlights the urgent need for effective interventions that address sexual violence.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 45, No. 3, 299-315 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128799045003001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
T. H. Grubesic, E. Mack, and A. T. Murray
Geographic Exclusion: Spatial Analysis for Evaluating the Implications of Megan's Law
Social Science Computer Review, May 1, 2007; 25(2): 143 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
W. Edwards and C. Hensley
Restructuring Sex Offender Sentencing: A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Approach to the Criminal Justice Process
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, December 1, 2001; 45(6): 646 - 662.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
A. Malesky and J. Keim
Mental Health Professionals' Perspectives on Sex Offender Registry Web Sites
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, January 1, 2001; 13(1): 53 - 63.
[Abstract] [PDF]