Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Crime & Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lanza-Kaduce, L.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Comparative Recidivism Analysis of Releasees from Private and Public Prisons

Lonn Lanza-Kaduce

Karen F. Parker

Charles W. Thomas

This research compared the recidivism rates of groups of releasees from privately and publicly operated prisons. The study consisted of 198 male releasees from two private facilities in Florida who were precision matched with releasees from public prisons. Recidivism over one year was measured in alternative ways. The private prison group had lower rates of recidivism. Those released from private prisons who reoffended committed less serious subsequent offenses than did their public prison counterparts. The two groups were similar in how long it took for rearrest or for the first recidivism event to occur.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 45, No. 1, 28-47 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128799045001002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
D. M. Daggett and S. D. Camp
Do Official Misconduct Data Tell the Same Story as the Individuals Who Live in Prison?
Criminal Justice Review, September 1, 2009; 34(3): 428 - 449.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
B. W. Lundahl, C. Kunz, C. Brownell, N. Harris, and R. Van Vleet
Prison Privatization: A Meta-analysis of Cost and Quality of Confinement Indicators
Research on Social Work Practice, July 1, 2009; 19(4): 383 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice Policy ReviewHome page
J. J. Vardalis and F. W. Becker
Legislative Opinions Concerning the Private Operation of State Prisons: The Case of Florida
Criminal Justice Policy Review, June 1, 2000; 11(2): 136 - 148.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
L. Lanza-Kaduce, K. F. Parker, and C. W. Thomas
The Devil in the Details: The Case Against the Case Study of Private Prisons, Criminological Research, and Conflict of Interest
Crime Delinquency, January 1, 2000; 46(1): 92 - 136.
[PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
A. L. SCHNEIDER
Public-Private Partnerships in the U.S. Prison System
American Behavioral Scientist, September 1, 1999; 43(1): 192 - 208.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
G. Geis, A. Mobley, and D. Shichor
Private Prisons, Criminological Research, and Conflict of Interest: A Case Study
Crime Delinquency, July 1, 1999; 45(3): 372 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
C. E. Frazier, D. M. Bishop, and L. Lanza-Kaduce
Get-Tough Juvenile Justice Reforms: The Florida Experience
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, January 1, 1999; 564(1): 167 - 184.
[Abstract] [PDF]