Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Crime & Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sims, B.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Predicting Success or Failure on Probation: Factors Associated with Felony Probation Outcomes

Barbara Sims

Mark Jones

This study examined the factors associated with success or failure on probation for 2,850 North Carolina felony probationers who were removed from supervision between July 1 and October 31, 1993. Probationers were profiled on various demographic, sentence, and probation characteristics. Chi-square analysis was used to determine differences within various subgroups of the sample, and logistic regression was used to predict failure on probation in two separate models. The findings suggest that risk assessment items used by probation officers to determine level of supervision for probationers perform well in a logistic regression equation.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 43, No. 3, 314-327 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128797043003005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Contemporary Criminal JusticeHome page
J. S. Albanese
Risk Assessment in Organized Crime: Developing a Market and Product-Based Model to Determine Threat Levels
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, August 1, 2008; 24(3): 263 - 273.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice Policy ReviewHome page
N. Rodriguez and V. J. Webb
Probation Violations, Revocations, and Imprisonment: The Decisions of Probation Officers, Prosecutors, and Judges Pre- and Post-Mandatory Drug Treatment
Criminal Justice Policy Review, March 1, 2007; 18(1): 3 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Probation JournalHome page
A. H. Berman
Reconviction outcomes among Swedish male probationers: Pattern analysis by substance use
Probation Journal, September 1, 2005; 52(3): 296 - 299.
[PDF]


Home page
Youth SocietyHome page
B. B. BENDA and R. F. CORWYN
The Effect of Abuse in Childhood and in Adolescence on Violence among Adolescents
Youth Society, March 1, 2002; 33(3): 339 - 365.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in Crime and DelinquencyHome page
B. B. Benda
Religion and Violent Offenders in Boot Camp: A Structural Equation Model
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, February 1, 2002; 39(1): 91 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
M. K. Gray, M. Fields, and S. R. Maxwell
Examining Probation Violations: Who, What, and When
Crime Delinquency, October 1, 2001; 47(4): 537 - 557.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary Criminal JusticeHome page
D. E. OLSON, R. A. WEISHEIT, and T. ELLSWORTH
Getting Down to Business: A Comparison of Rural and Urban Probationers, Probation Sentences, and Probation Outcomes
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, February 1, 2001; 17(1): 4 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]