Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Crime & Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, E.
Right arrow Articles by Weissman, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Revising Federal Sentencing Policy: Some Consequences of Expanding Eligibility for Alternative Sanctions

Elaine Wolf

Marsha Weissman

Although the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 advocated the use of "least restrictive alternatives," the U.S. Sentencing Commission has devised guidelines that authorize prison for all felony convictions. Nonincarcerative sentences are available for low-level offenders, but research has shown that the use of probation and other alternative sanctions has declined since the full-scale adoption of the guidelines in 1989. Applying criteria for imposing sentences of imprisonment adopted by the National Council on Crime and Delinquency to U.S. Sentencing Commission data from 1992 and 1993, we show that a large number of cases in the federal caseload that were considered ineligible for nonincarcerative sanctions may merit "a second look" and be considered for alternative sentences.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 42, No. 2, 192-205 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128796042002002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJPHHome page
C. Golembeski and R. Fullilove
Criminal (In)Justice in the City and Its Associated Health Consequences
Am J Public Health, September 1, 2008; 98(Supplement_1): S185 - S190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
C. Golembeski and R. Fullilove
Criminal (In)Justice in the City and Its Associated Health Consequences
Am J Public Health, October 1, 2005; 95(10): 1701 - 1706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]