Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Crime & Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lilly, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by McMullen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Electronic Monitoring of the Drunk Driver: A Seven-Year Study of the Home Confinement Alternative

J. Robert Lilly

Richard A. Ball

G. David Curry

John McMullen

This article evaluates the success of a program using electronic monitoring (EM) as the "front end" of a probation term for drunk drivers during three different program phases lasting over 7 years. The data indicate that EM was implemented with few equipment problems or client complaints and was very cost-effective, with nearly all the clients completing their EM period successfully. There was no evidence of any "add-on" effect, nor was there much evidence of selection bias by gender, age, race, or socioeconomic status. Probation success declined, however, during the post-EM probation period.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 39, No. 4, 462-484 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128793039004004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The Prison JournalHome page
R. STANZ and R. TEWKSBURY
Predictors of Success and Recidivism in a Home Incarceration Program
The Prison Journal, September 1, 2000; 80(3): 326 - 344.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
J. Bonta, S. Wallace-Capretta, and J. Rooney
Can Electronic Monitoring Make a Difference? An Evaluation of Three Canadian Programs
Crime Delinquency, January 1, 2000; 46(1): 61 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal Justice Policy ReviewHome page
K. E. Courtright
Book Reviews : Smart Sentencing: The Emergence of Intermediate Sanctions Editors: James M. Byrne, Arthur J. Lurigio, and Joan Petersilia Publisher: Sage Publications, Inc. Pages: 352 Price: $22.95
Criminal Justice Policy Review, June 1, 1995; 7(2): 216 - 222.