|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Juvenile (In)Justice and the Criminal Court Alternative
Barry C. Feld
The juvenile court has been transformed from an informal, welfare agency into a scaled-down, second-class criminal court as a result of a series of reforms that divert status offenders, waive serious offenders to adult criminal courts, punish delinquent offenders, and provide more formal procedures. There are three plausible policy responses to juvenile courts that punish in the name of treatment and deny elementary procedural justice: (a) restructure juvenile courts to fit their original therapeutic purpose; (b) accept punishment as the purpose of delinquency proceedings, but coupled with criminal procedural safeguards; or (c) abolish juvenile courts and try young offenders in criminal courts with certain substantive and procedural modifications.
Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 39, No. 4,
403-424 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128793039004001

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. V. Merlo and P. J. Benekos
Defining Juvenile Justice in the 21st Century
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice,
July 1, 2003;
1(3):
276 - 288.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. R. Corrado, I. M. Cohen, W. Glackman, and C. Odgers
Serious and Violent Young Offenders' Decisions to Recidivate: An Assessment of Five Sentencing Models
Crime Delinquency,
April 1, 2003;
49(2):
179 - 200.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. N. Ferdinand and M. J. McDermott
Joining Punishment and Treatment in Substantive Equality
Criminal Justice Policy Review,
June 1, 2002;
13(2):
87 - 116.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. B. Sanborn Jr.
A Parens Patriae Figure or Impartial Fact Finder: Policy Questions and Conflicts for the Juvenile Court Judge
Criminal Justice Policy Review,
December 1, 2001;
12(4):
311 - 332.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Kerbs
(Un)equal Justice: Juvenile Court Abolition and African Americans
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
January 1, 1999;
564(1):
109 - 125.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. M. Schwartz, N. A. Weiner, and G. Enosh
Myopic Justice? The Juvenile Court and Child Welfare Systems
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
January 1, 1999;
564(1):
126 - 141.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. A. Risler, T. Sweatman, and L. Nackerud
Evaluating the Georgia Legislative Waiver's Effectiveness in Deterring Juvenile Crime
Research on Social Work Practice,
November 1, 1998;
8(6):
657 - 667.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. P. Mears
Evaluation Issues Confronting Juvenile Justice Sentencing Reforms: A Case Study of Texas
Crime Delinquency,
July 1, 1998;
44(3):
443 - 463.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Bishop, C. E. Frazier, L. Lanza-Kaduce, and L. Winner
The Transfer of Juveniles to Criminal Court: Does it Make a Difference?
Crime Delinquency,
April 1, 1996;
42(2):
171 - 191.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|
|