|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Automatic Waiver of Juveniles and Substantive Justice
Simon I. Singer
Legislative waiver bypasses juvenile court and juvenile justice officials by initially transferring jurisdiction over juveniles arrested for serious offenses to criminal court. Supporters of legislative waiver argue that the exclusion of offense categories from juvenile court jurisdiction best meets the punishment-oriented objectives of waiver. However, a logistic regression analysis of case processing decisions in a state with automatic transfer provisions revealed that juvenile offenders from single-parent households were more likely to face a grand jury indictment than juveniles from dual-parent households.
Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 39, No. 2,
253-261 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128793039002009

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Burrow
Examining the Influence of Matza's Principles of Justice and Their Impact on Reverse Waiver Decisions: Has Kadi-(In)justice Survived?
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice,
January 1, 2008;
6(1):
59 - 82.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H. Lemmon, T. L. Austin, P. J. Verrecchia, and M. Fetzer
The Effect of Legal and Extralegal Factors on Statutory Exclusion of Juvenile Offenders
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice,
July 1, 2005;
3(3):
214 - 234.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. R. Marczyk, K. Heilbrun, T. Lander, and D. Dematteo
Juvenile Decertification: Developing a Model for Classification and Prediction
Criminal Justice and Behavior,
June 1, 2005;
32(3):
278 - 301.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Bishop, C. E. Frazier, L. Lanza-Kaduce, and L. Winner
The Transfer of Juveniles to Criminal Court: Does it Make a Difference?
Crime Delinquency,
April 1, 1996;
42(2):
171 - 191.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|
|