Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Crime & Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCorkle, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Notes

Research Note: Punish and Rehabilitate? Public Attitudes Toward Six Common Crimes

Richard C. McCorkle

Opinion polls show increasing punitiveness among the public toward criminals. However, methodological issues raise questions about the use of such polls in developing public policy. To provide a more accurate description of attitudes toward crime, a telephone survey of 397 adults was conducted in which punitive and rehabilitative sentiments toward six common crimes were examined. Respondents expressed a strong punishment orientation toward all six offenses, this punitiveness being relatively uniform across a variety of demographic and attitudinal subpopulations within the sample. However, strong support was also expressed for rehabilitative programs, particularly among the young, poor, and minority populations.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 39, No. 2, 240-252 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128793039002008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Research in Crime and DelinquencyHome page
D. P. Mears, C. Mancini, and E. A. Stewart
Whites' Concern about Crime: The Effects of Interracial Contact
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, November 1, 2009; 46(4): 524 - 552.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
B. K. Applegate, H. P. Smith, A. H. Sitren, and N. Fariello Springer
From the Inside: The Meaning of Probation to Probationers
Criminal Justice Review, March 1, 2009; 34(1): 80 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Probation JournalHome page
S. Maruna and A. King
Selling the Public on Probation: Beyond the Bib
Probation Journal, December 1, 2008; 55(4): 337 - 351.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
D. P. Mears, C. Mancini, M. Gertz, and J. Bratton
Sex Crimes, Children, and Pornography: Public Views and Public Policy
Crime Delinquency, October 1, 2008; 54(4): 532 - 559.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
S. Herzog
Plea Bargaining Practices: Less Covert, more Public Support?
Crime Delinquency, October 1, 2004; 50(4): 590 - 614.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Prison JournalHome page
T. J. Caeti, C. Hemmens, F. T. Cullen, and V. S. Burton Jr.
Management of Juvenile Correctional Facilities
The Prison Journal, December 1, 2003; 83(4): 383 - 405.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
J. L. SUNDT, F. T. CULLEN, B. K. APPLEGATE, and M. G. TURNER
The Tenacity of the Rehabilitative Ideal Revisited: Have Attitudes Toward Offender Treatment Changed?
Criminal Justice and Behavior, December 1, 1998; 25(4): 426 - 442.
[Abstract]


Home page
The Prison JournalHome page
B. K. APPLEGATE, F. T. CULLEN, and B. S. FISHER
Public Support for Correctional Treatment: The Continuing Appeal of the Rehabilitative Ideal
The Prison Journal, September 1, 1997; 77(3): 237 - 258.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Prison JournalHome page
M. G. TURNER, F. T. CULLEN, J. L. SUNDT, and B. K. APPLEGATE
Public Tolerance for Community-Based Sanctions
The Prison Journal, March 1, 1997; 77(1): 6 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
K. R. HENNING and B. C. FRUEH
Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Incarcerated Offenders: An Evaluation of the Vermont Department of Corrections' Cognitive Self-Change Program
Criminal Justice and Behavior, December 1, 1996; 23(4): 523 - 541.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Research in Crime and DelinquencyHome page
F. T. CULLEN
Assessing the Penal Harm Movement
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, August 1, 1995; 32(3): 338 - 358.
[PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
B. K. Applegate, F. T. Cullen, S. M. Barton, P. J. Richards, L. Lanza-Kaduce, and B. G. Link
Public Support for Drunk-Driving Countermeasures: Social Policy for Saving Lives
Crime Delinquency, April 1, 1995; 41(2): 171 - 190.
[Abstract]