Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Crime & Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reintegrating the Concept of Community into Community-Based Corrections

James M. Byrne

Police administrators across the country are developing a range of community-oriented policing strategies at a time when community corrections administrators are moving in the opposite direction by applying traditional, offender-based policing concepts to probation and parole practice. I highlight the limitations of this new wave of intermediate sanction programs and then discuss the importance of community context (i.e., community attitudes, tolerance, support, and structure) to the development of effective adult supervision strategies. I conclude by describing the four key characteristics of a community-oriented approach to probation and parole supervision: (1) service brokerage, (2) advocacy for offenders and victims, (3) triage, and (4) location in the community.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 35, No. 3, 471-499 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128789035003010
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
J. E. Ryan
Who Gets Revoked? A Comparison of Intensive Supervision Successes and Failures in Vermont
Crime Delinquency, January 1, 1997; 43(1): 104 - 118.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
G. Bazemore and M. Umbreit
Rethinking the Sanctioning Function in Juvenile Court: Retributive or Restorative Responses to Youth Crime
Crime Delinquency, July 1, 1995; 41(3): 296 - 316.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
R. Lawrence
Reexamining Community Corrections Models
Crime Delinquency, October 1, 1991; 37(4): 449 - 464.
[Abstract]