Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Crime & Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steinberg, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

From Private Prosecution to Plea Bargaining: Criminal Prosecution, the District Attorney, and American Legal History

Allen Steinberg

Despite the general assumption that the gates of the American criminal justice process have always been guarded by public prosecutors, an examination of the case law and social history of criminal prosecution suggests a much more complex transformation of American criminal justice from an eighteenth and early ninteenth century system dominated by private prosecution. In Philadelphia, this system of private prosecution kept most of the power over the disposition of a criminal case in the hands of the private litigants and petty magistrates, generated a highly articulated legal culture, and resulted in relatively few jury trials. The assumption of power by the district attorney during the last third of the nineteenth century emerged from the internal contradictions of this system, but it amounted to a transformation from one form of nontrial descretionary justice to another.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 30, No. 4, 568-592 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/0011128784030004007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
Yue Ma
Exploring the Origins of Public Prosecution
International Criminal Justice Review, June 1, 2008; 18(2): 190 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Punishment SocietyHome page
K. Levine
Book Review: Jury trials and plea bargaining: A true history
Punishment Society, April 1, 2007; 9(2): 214 - 216.
[PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
L. Lanza-Kaduce, K. F. Parker, and C. W. Thomas
A Comparative Recidivism Analysis of Releasees from Private and Public Prisons
Crime Delinquency, January 1, 1999; 45(1): 28 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]