This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Martin, S. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Commutation of Prison Sentences: Practice, Promise, and Limitation

Executive clemency procedures offer an ancient but still modern mechanism for righting injustice and coping with problems arising when the judicial system fails to adjust to social needs. As the indeterminate sentence gives way to determinate sanctions and prison crowding grows acute, clemency, particularly in the form of commutation of sentences of prisoners, offers one means of adaptation to correctional population pressures. This article examines the legal and administrative structures, policies, and actual uses of sentence commutation in the United States. A survey of state commutation practices finds that there is wide variation in structure and policy among the states, that in general commutation is granted quite sparingly, that in response to sentencing changes states have both increased and decreased its use, and that political and practical considerations limit the use of commutation as a prison populaton safety valve.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 29, No. 4, 593-612 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/001112878302900407


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Cheatwood The Life-without-Parole Sanction: Its Current Status and a Research Agenda Crime Delinquency, January 1, 1988; 34(1): 43 - 59. [Abstract]