Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Crime & Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blumstein, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kadane, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Approach to the Allocation of Scarce Imprisonment Resources

Alfred Blumstein

Joseph B. Kadane

In response to the widespread problem of prison congestion, Connecticut's Corrections Commissioner, John Manson, has suggested that prison cells be allocated to judges so that they would assume some responsibility for keeping prison populations within capacity limits. We explore a number of the choices that must be made in implementing this proposal, including the questions of what units to allocate (e.g., cells or cell-years), to whom the allocation should go (courts, individual judges, or prosecutors), what rules for allocation would be proper and equitable, what procedures to follow when an allocation is depleted, how to manage spare cells for emergencies, and what research is needed to implement such a process. The Manson proposal forces a clear recognition of the need to deal with the problem of finite prison capacity, but the problems it raises warrant consideration of the Michigan "safety valve" or the Minnesota capacity-constrained sentencing guidelines for limiting prison congestion.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 29, No. 4, 546-560 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/001112878302900404


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
R. Rosenfeld and K. Kempf
The Scope and Purposes of Corrections: Exploring Alternative Responses to Crowding
Crime Delinquency, October 1, 1991; 37(4): 481 - 505.
[Abstract]