Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Crime & Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clear, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Barry, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Some Conceptual Issues in Incapacitating Offenders

Todd R. Clear

Donald M. Barry

Recently, growing attention has been paid to the concept of "incapacitation " as a crime-control device. Much of the increased interest in incapacitation has been the result of the existence of a developing consensus that other utilitarian punishment options, such as rehabilitation, are ineffective combined with an intuitive trust in the simple logic of incapacitation: incarcerated offenders can commit no crimes. An illustration of the importance of this growth in support for incapacitation is provided by the release in 1981 of the Report of the Attorney General's Commission on Violent Crime, which took a position staunchly supportive of incapacitation. The purpose of this paper is to point out some of the complexities underlying any attempt to implement a full-scale incapacitative model through the increased use of imprisonment. Our position is that, far from simple, the renewed use of incapacitative strategies is frought with difficulties. We expressly avoid a lengthy discussion of moral issues underlying the model, though we recognize their seriousness, as well. Instead, we point out technical concerns that make the effectiveness of an incapacitative approach problematic.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 29, No. 4, 529-545 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/001112878302900403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
J. G. EMSHOFF and W. S. DAVIDSON
The Effect of "Good Time" Credit on Inmate Behavior: A Quasi-Experiment
Criminal Justice and Behavior, September 1, 1987; 14(3): 335 - 351.
[Abstract]