Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Crime & Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blackmore, J.
Right arrow Articles by Welsh, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Selective Incapacitation: Sentencing According to Risk

John Blackmore

Jane Welsh

In October 1982, the Rand Corporation published Selective Incapacitation, a sentencing proposal based on seven years of research by a team of Rand researchers under the direction of Peter Greenwood. In his report, Greenwood claims to have developed a classification scheme that would enable criminal Justice practitioners to determine which offenders should receive long, "incapacitating" prison sentences and which can be sentenced to alternative programs or safely released to the community. If implemented in its purest form, he says, selective incapacitation could result both in a net reduction of crime in the community and in the number of offenders who would need to be incarcerated. Since the release of the Rand report, most criminologists agree that Greenwood's findings are incomplete, methodologically flawed, and do not justify his policy proposal. Some have also raised moral and legal objections to it. In this article we outline the history, criticism and impact of selective incapacitation. We find that there are no clear and forceful answers to the dilemmas posed by the Greenwood saga. However, the,pressure on the research community to come up with quick and easy answers to complex social problems, we suggest, is less than subtle, particularly when money, reputation and the ability to do research hang in the balance.

Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 29, No. 4, 504-528 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/001112878302900402


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
E. Silver and L. L. Miller
A Cautionary Note on the Use of Actuarial Risk Assessment Tools for Social Control
Crime Delinquency, January 1, 2002; 48(1): 138 - 161.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
S. Ekland-Olson, W. R. Kelly, and M. Eisenberg
Crime and Incarceration: Some Comparative Findings from the 1980s
Crime Delinquency, July 1, 1992; 38(3): 392 - 416.
[Abstract]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
J. G. EMSHOFF and W. S. DAVIDSON
The Effect of "Good Time" Credit on Inmate Behavior: A Quasi-Experiment
Criminal Justice and Behavior, September 1, 1987; 14(3): 335 - 351.
[Abstract]