This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst[PDF]) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Seipel, C. Articles by Eifler, S. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Opportunities, Rational Choice, and Self-Control: On the Interaction of Person and Situation in a General Theory of Crime

¹ University of Hildesheim
² University of Bielefeld

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: stefanie.eifler{at}uni-bielefeld.de.

	Abstract

In this article, deviant action is analyzed on the basis of ideas derived from Gottfredson and Hirschi’s self-control theory. Presumedly, self-control in interaction with opportunities can explain deviant action. This assumption is elaborated using the concept of high- and low-cost situations from rational choice theory. From this point of view, the hypotheses are that self-control predicts deviant action in low-cost situations, whereas utility predicts deviant action in high-cost situations. Two test strategies are employed in an empirical examination of these hypotheses. A standardized questionnaire was presented to a sample of 494 German adults aged 18 to 80. The results of both test strategies show that the assumptions of an interaction effect between self-control and opportunities are fundamentally supported.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?