This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst[PDF]) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Bouffard, L. A. Articles by Piquero, N. L. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Defiance Theory and Life Course Explanations of Persistent Offending

¹ Washington State University
² John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lbouffard{at}wsu.edu.

	Abstract

Criminologists have long grappled with the varying effect of sanctions. In an effort to clarify these divergent effects, Sherman (1993) delineated a general theory of sanction effects, termed defiance theory. Defiance theory anticipates that there are four necessary conditions for defiance to occur: (a) the sanction must be perceived as unfair; (b) the offender must be poorly bonded; (c) the sanction must be perceived as stigmatizing; and (d) the offender denies the shame produced by the sanction. This study provides one of the first empirical assessments of defiance theory. In addition, defiance theory is examined within the life-course perspective, and analyses address trajectories of offending. Using data from the 1945 Philadelphia Birth Cohort, the results yield promising support for the theory.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?